independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Fri 22nd Jun 2018 12:06am
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > Trump on China: President for life? That's great.
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 03/05/18 10:14am

2freaky4church
1

avatar

Trump on China: President for life? That's great.

This is dictator talk. The fuckin people applauded. We should be as innovative as China but that is it.

"My motherfucker's so cool sheep count him."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 03/05/18 11:38am

TrivialPursuit

When I saw a link to this story on Twitter, I RT'd w/ the comment:

"Does anyone see the utter fucking terror this statement has on normal people?! He is literally wanting to be a dictator. You #maga people will be the first to be disarmed & shot on site when your Hitler aka @realDonaldTrump walks over you & steals your life.

#Resist

This experience will cover courtship, sex, commitment, fetishes, loneliness, vindication, love, and hate.
http://bit.ly/1D3FG2U
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 03/05/18 11:47am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

unacceptable

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 03/05/18 4:45pm

poppys

TrivialPursuit said:

When I saw a link to this story on Twitter, I RT'd w/ the comment:

"Does anyone see the utter fucking terror this statement has on normal people?! He is literally wanting to be a dictator. You #maga people will be the first to be disarmed & shot on site when your Hitler aka @realDonaldTrump walks over you & steals your life.

#Resist

What story? Maybe 2freaky should actually post one.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 03/05/18 6:08pm

TrivialPursuit

poppys said:

TrivialPursuit said:

When I saw a link to this story on Twitter, I RT'd w/ the comment:

What story? Maybe 2freaky should actually post one.


Here.

This experience will cover courtship, sex, commitment, fetishes, loneliness, vindication, love, and hate.
http://bit.ly/1D3FG2U
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 03/07/18 7:14am

NorthC

Thanks for the link. I saw something that I don't see very often: a statement by Trump that made sense and I agree with: invading Iraq was the worst decision ever.
I may disagree with everything you say, but I will defend your right to say it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 03/07/18 8:22am

2freaky4church
1

avatar

Venezuela has elections.

"My motherfucker's so cool sheep count him."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 03/07/18 9:49am

NorthC

2freaky4church1 said:

Venezuela has elections.


And your point would be what?
I may disagree with everything you say, but I will defend your right to say it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 03/07/18 9:50am

2freaky4church
1

avatar

My point..

"My motherfucker's so cool sheep count him."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 03/07/18 9:53am

NorthC

2freaky4church1 said:

My point..


Is that you don't have one?
I may disagree with everything you say, but I will defend your right to say it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 03/07/18 9:55am

2freaky4church
1

avatar

We love China not Venezuela.

"My motherfucker's so cool sheep count him."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 03/07/18 10:09am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

2freaky4church1 said:

Venezuela has elections.

and you believe them to be legit?

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 03/07/18 10:40am

TrivialPursuit

NorthC said:

Thanks for the link. I saw something that I don't see very often: a statement by Trump that made sense and I agree with: invading Iraq was the worst decision ever.


I would venture to say many Americans hold that opinion as well. It's no great insight by the orange anus.

Bush perfected the propaganda machine. Whenever he mentioned 9/11 he would say Iraq in the same sentence. He, and Dick, and Rumsy, did it so much that people began to associate the two: 9/11 - Iraq. 9/11 - Iraq. IRAQ DID 9/11. When in fact, when the facts were out about where these 19 people were from, none were from Iraq or Afghanistan. Fifteen were from the U.S.'s oil buddies, a violent and oppressive regime - Saudia Arabia. The rest were from Egypt, Lebanon, and United Arab Emirates. But Bush pushed the Iraq agenda for his own reasons.

It not only showed the power of propaganda, it also showed the ignorance and flat-out stupidity of Americans in the marches of blind patriotism, flag waving at NFL games (a purposeful government initiative to rally military enlistments), and 'MURRICA rallies that they'll believe anything.

That seems to be boiled down to a concentrated faction in 2018 and it got Trump elected...but only by the electoral, not the popular vote. But watch when beer cans and Levi's start going up in price because of these tariffs, his base is going to lose their shit. Trump's lies and propaganda will crumble.

This experience will cover courtship, sex, commitment, fetishes, loneliness, vindication, love, and hate.
http://bit.ly/1D3FG2U
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 03/07/18 11:03am

NorthC

2freaky4church1 said:

We love China not Venezuela.


You should change your username to "2cryptic2understand", but I think I get it... Trump loves China where they don't have elections, but he hates Venezuela where they do have elections? Which, as Only pointed out, may not be legit? (And that's putting it mildly.) Both countries are run by dictators and yes, the so-called "free world" always has and always will have dubious (and strange) relationships with dictators. Nothing new there.
Sorry, couldn't help a little Prince-related joke. wink
I may disagree with everything you say, but I will defend your right to say it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 03/07/18 11:19am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

NorthC said:

2freaky4church1 said:

We love China not Venezuela.


You should change your username to "2cryptic2understand", but I think I get it... Trump loves China where they don't have elections, but he hates Venezuela where they do have elections? Which, as Only pointed out, may not be legit? (And that's putting it mildly.) Both countries are run by dictators and yes, the so-called "free world" always has and always will have dubious (and strange) relationships with dictators. Nothing new there.
Sorry, couldn't help a little Prince-related joke. wink


2Freaky4Context
Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 03/07/18 11:37am

NorthC

lol
I may disagree with everything you say, but I will defend your right to say it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 03/07/18 2:05pm

IanRG

NorthC said:

2freaky4church1 said:

We love China not Venezuela.

You should change your username to "2cryptic2understand", but I think I get it... Trump loves China where they don't have elections, but he hates Venezuela where they do have elections? Which, as Only pointed out, may not be legit? (And that's putting it mildly.) Both countries are run by dictators and yes, the so-called "free world" always has and always will have dubious (and strange) relationships with dictators. Nothing new there. Sorry, couldn't help a little Prince-related joke. wink

.

You never need to apologise for Prince reference on a Prince fan site.

.

Indeed, perhaps we should it more in P&R. It could serve as a reminder that we are all one people - people with appreciation for Prince and his music that others may describe as an obsession. The Prince ref could be recognised as a circuit breaker for the endless loops so many of the threads end up in.

[Edited 3/7/18 14:06pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 03/07/18 2:57pm

SuperFurryAnim
al

avatar

Obama was a puppet for China. China has been manipulating currency forever so bring on the tariff. You want a trade War China, you are not going to push around Trump.

TERM LIMITS?

MAYBE WE SHOULD HAVE TERM LIMITS FOR CONGRESS!? TAKE YOUR PENSION 80YO AND GET LOST!

You better Watch Out! I'm a WAR MACHINE!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 03/08/18 9:30am

2freaky4church
1

avatar

OnlyNdawordsalad.

"My motherfucker's so cool sheep count him."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 03/08/18 5:58pm

SuperFurryAnim
al

avatar

2freaky4church1 said:

This is dictator talk. The fuckin people applauded. We should be as innovative as China but that is it.

HILLARY CLINTON COULD STILL BECOME PRESIDENT IF RUSSIA PROBE FINDS CONSPIRACY EVIDENCE

http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-president-trump-russia-probe-lawrence-lessig-784081

You better Watch Out! I'm a WAR MACHINE!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 03/09/18 12:04am

214

SuperFurryAnimal said:

2freaky4church1 said:

This is dictator talk. The fuckin people applauded. We should be as innovative as China but that is it.

HILLARY CLINTON COULD STILL BECOME PRESIDENT IF RUSSIA PROBE FINDS CONSPIRACY EVIDENCE

http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-president-trump-russia-probe-lawrence-lessig-784081

eek eek FOR REAL?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 03/11/18 12:57pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

SuperFurryAnimal said:

2freaky4church1 said:

This is dictator talk. The fuckin people applauded. We should be as innovative as China but that is it.

HILLARY CLINTON COULD STILL BECOME PRESIDENT IF RUSSIA PROBE FINDS CONSPIRACY EVIDENCE

http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-president-trump-russia-probe-lawrence-lessig-784081

huh i have not read...but i am going to say not very likely... and none of that has much to do with collusion. LOL



Mr. Furman, what you’ve just wrote is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this group is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.


His argument is that Paul Ryan would appoint her? Now in 2018 if dems took over and both trump and pence were to leave without appointing a new VP... maybe.


but that would be an absolute disaster.

[Edited 3/11/18 13:07pm]

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 03/11/18 2:17pm

SuperFurryAnim
al

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

SuperFurryAnimal said:

HILLARY CLINTON COULD STILL BECOME PRESIDENT IF RUSSIA PROBE FINDS CONSPIRACY EVIDENCE

http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-president-trump-russia-probe-lawrence-lessig-784081

huh i have not read...but i am going to say not very likely... and none of that has much to do with collusion. LOL

Mainstream media has peddled this story ever since Trump became supreme ruler of the US of A.

You better Watch Out! I'm a WAR MACHINE!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 03/11/18 3:07pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

SuperFurryAnimal said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

huh i have not read...but i am going to say not very likely... and none of that has much to do with collusion. LOL

Mainstream media has peddled this story ever since Trump became supreme ruler of the US of A.

when trump and ONLY trump was asked if he would contest the results if he lost and he did not say "no" he was attacked. They mocked him when he said it was rigged. Even Barack said voter fraud existed but tended to help Democrats. And there was some sum fool with a sign "it's not rigged you're just losing." (and who could forget the armed men intimidating voters to vote their way)


But now they are so mad she lost they can not move on... it is a sickness. And I am no fan of trump. I even said that it might be better for her to win... as she will fail and she might as well take her party with her.

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 03/12/18 5:21am

DiminutiveRock
er

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

SuperFurryAnimal said:

Mainstream media has peddled this story ever since Trump became supreme ruler of the US of A.

when trump and ONLY trump was asked if he would contest the results if he lost and he did not say "no" he was attacked. They mocked him when he said it was rigged. Even Barack said voter fraud existed but tended to help Democrats. And there was some sum fool with a sign "it's not rigged you're just losing." (and who could forget the armed men intimidating voters to vote their way)


But now they are so mad she lost they can not move on... it is a sickness. And I am no fan of trump. I even said that it might be better for her to win... as she will fail and she might as well take her party with her.


spit Who is "they" ? You two are the ones who bring up her name with more consistency than any other person on this site or in the whole of mainstream media.

"'Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.'' - Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 03/12/18 5:34am

benni

OnlyNDaUsa said:

SuperFurryAnimal said:

Mainstream media has peddled this story ever since Trump became supreme ruler of the US of A.

when trump and ONLY trump was asked if he would contest the results if he lost and he did not say "no" he was attacked. They mocked him when he said it was rigged. Even Barack said voter fraud existed but tended to help Democrats. And there was some sum fool with a sign "it's not rigged you're just losing." (and who could forget the armed men intimidating voters to vote their way)


But now they are so mad she lost they can not move on... it is a sickness. And I am no fan of trump. I even said that it might be better for her to win... as she will fail and she might as well take her party with her.


I never hear democrats bring up Hillary's loss. I see them respond to Republicans who claim the whole Russian meddling, Trump collusion, is Democrats being sore losers and can't get past Hillary's loss, but I never see them say, "I can't believe Hillary lost." The only time I ever see Hillary or Obama's names brought up are by Republicans who are arguing against the backlash against Trump. Why does any of this have to be a response to the election outcome? Have you ever thought that the response is due to Trump himself? His comments about women, his comments about Mexico, his petty name calling, his backpedaling on issues, his flagrant lies, his constant bragging and need for adulation, his refusal to let the election outcome go, his policies, his constant saying, "Well, Hillary did worse," or "Obama did worse", his constant need to blame others instead of accepting responsibility? And I could go on and on. From what I've seen, Democrats have let the election go. It is Trump and his followers that cannot let it go, that have a need to bring it up as frequently as they can. Trump is so insecure that when he has rallies, he has to bring up the election results, "Didn't I do great?" Dude (Trump), get over yourself. The election was over a year ago, we've all moved on, why hasn't Trump?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 03/12/18 8:34am

2freaky4church
1

avatar

His deplorable idiots in PA thought it was great. Then he calls Chuck Todd a sleepy eyed son of a bitch! Impeach before we all die.

"My motherfucker's so cool sheep count him."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 03/12/18 1:18pm

2elijah

avatar

Nobody wants a nutcase like trump to be president of this country for life. That’s would be like going back to the days of slavery and barbarism.
FEARLESS
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 03/12/18 1:59pm

DiminutiveRock
er

avatar

benni said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

when trump and ONLY trump was asked if he would contest the results if he lost and he did not say "no" he was attacked. They mocked him when he said it was rigged. Even Barack said voter fraud existed but tended to help Democrats. And there was some sum fool with a sign "it's not rigged you're just losing." (and who could forget the armed men intimidating voters to vote their way)


But now they are so mad she lost they can not move on... it is a sickness. And I am no fan of trump. I even said that it might be better for her to win... as she will fail and she might as well take her party with her.


I never hear democrats bring up Hillary's loss. I see them respond to Republicans who claim the whole Russian meddling, Trump collusion, is Democrats being sore losers and can't get past Hillary's loss, but I never see them say, "I can't believe Hillary lost." The only time I ever see Hillary or Obama's names brought up are by Republicans who are arguing against the backlash against Trump. Why does any of this have to be a response to the election outcome? Have you ever thought that the response is due to Trump himself? His comments about women, his comments about Mexico, his petty name calling, his backpedaling on issues, his flagrant lies, his constant bragging and need for adulation, his refusal to let the election outcome go, his policies, his constant saying, "Well, Hillary did worse," or "Obama did worse", his constant need to blame others instead of accepting responsibility? And I could go on and on. From what I've seen, Democrats have let the election go. It is Trump and his followers that cannot let it go, that have a need to bring it up as frequently as they can. Trump is so insecure that when he has rallies, he has to bring up the election results, "Didn't I do great?" Dude (Trump), get over yourself. The election was over a year ago, we've all moved on, why hasn't Trump?

True - DJT keeps her name in the media because he is obsessed with her and thinks he is campaigning against her and Obama.




disbelief

"'Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.'' - Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 03/12/18 3:09pm

2elijah

avatar

DiminutiveRocker said:



benni said:




OnlyNDaUsa said:





when trump and ONLY trump was asked if he would contest the results if he lost and he did not say "no" he was attacked. They mocked him when he said it was rigged. Even Barack said voter fraud existed but tended to help Democrats. And there was some sum fool with a sign "it's not rigged you're just losing." (and who could forget the armed men intimidating voters to vote their way)



But now they are so mad she lost they can not move on... it is a sickness. And I am no fan of trump. I even said that it might be better for her to win... as she will fail and she might as well take her party with her.




I never hear democrats bring up Hillary's loss. I see them respond to Republicans who claim the whole Russian meddling, Trump collusion, is Democrats being sore losers and can't get past Hillary's loss, but I never see them say, "I can't believe Hillary lost." The only time I ever see Hillary or Obama's names brought up are by Republicans who are arguing against the backlash against Trump. Why does any of this have to be a response to the election outcome? Have you ever thought that the response is due to Trump himself? His comments about women, his comments about Mexico, his petty name calling, his backpedaling on issues, his flagrant lies, his constant bragging and need for adulation, his refusal to let the election outcome go, his policies, his constant saying, "Well, Hillary did worse," or "Obama did worse", his constant need to blame others instead of accepting responsibility? And I could go on and on. From what I've seen, Democrats have let the election go. It is Trump and his followers that cannot let it go, that have a need to bring it up as frequently as they can. Trump is so insecure that when he has rallies, he has to bring up the election results, "Didn't I do great?" Dude (Trump), get over yourself. The election was over a year ago, we've all moved on, why hasn't Trump?




True - DJT keeps her name in the media because he is obsessed with her and thinks he is campaigning against her and Obama.




disbelief


Exactly. It’s almost like he’s insecure about the win.
FEARLESS
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > Trump on China: President for life? That's great.