independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Mon 16th Oct 2017 3:08pm
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Discuss The Sharon Nelson Q&A Thread Here - And Only Here
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 8 of 9 <123456789>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #210 posted 08/19/17 7:08pm

purplefam99

Purplebflogirl said:

luvgirl said:



purplefam99 said:


luvgirl said:



Yes, I would love to know what led to her thinking this way. There had to be a reason why she decided to say that Denise was the love of Prince's life. The reason is the alluring part in all of this. I get that this is her opinion, but it's how she came by that opinion that I think would be the real revelation.





I'm curious by that notion as well, do you think perhaps she had the chance To meet Denise ever? something had to make her feel that way. I'm grateful She was willing to give her opinion.


It's certainly possible that she met her, she had almost thirty years to do so. Yes, I believe something led her to say Denise was the love of his life. I wish I could have another question and answer! I'd be all over this like Purplebfflogirl, my new found hero... lol





[Edited 8/18/17 22:09pm]


Aww TY.IMHO most already knew she was the love of his life..But it was good to get the opinion of a family member..She knew him..we didn't.And again for the M1 &M2 fans.. nobody is saying he didn't love them at one time but when their relationships ended..so did communication.He kept in contact with Denise..that alone speaks volumes.



Yes purplebflogirl volumes!!!!! Thanks again for your brave question.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #211 posted 08/19/17 7:13pm

Purplebflogirl

purplefam99 said:

Purplebflogirl said:


Aww TY.IMHO most already knew she was the love of his life..But it was good to get the opinion of a family member..She knew him..we didn't.And again for the M1 &M2 fans.. nobody is saying he didn't love them at one time but when their relationships ended..so did communication.He kept in contact with Denise..that alone speaks volumes.



Yes purplebflogirl volumes!!!!! Thanks again for your brave question.

smile
Until the end of time
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #212 posted 08/19/17 7:13pm

purplefam99

rogifan said:

Rebeljuice said:

The most revealing things from part II for me are:

1) how little input the heirs seem to have regarding business decisions this late in the game.

2) How WB and the heirs seem to have very little common interest and do not seem to be on the same page.

3) How she may be as in the dark about the circumstances surrounding his death as the rest of us.

4) The heirs (or at least Sharon's) ideas going forward regarding the music is reasuring.

5) I found it a little worrying that she says they want to maintain Prince's ideals regarding swearing etc. She even seemed to imply disapointment in WB for releasing We Can Fuck. I hope this doesn't mean a whole bunch of songs will remain unreleased because the lyrics are less than clean.


Regarding #5 I have a feeling whatever the heirs have a say in will not include profanity. That doesn’t bother me. One, because I respect Prince’s feelings here and two, because I think there is be plenty of amazing music in the vault that doesn’t contain profanity.



I agree.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #213 posted 08/20/17 7:59am

muleFunk

avatar

SchlomoThaHomo said:

She made a point to draw a line between the heirs and the estate, divulging that they had no say in regards to estate matters. I found this confusing. I thought the heirs WERE the estate. And who is the estate if not the heirs, why do the heirs have no say, who is/are making the current estate decisions, and who authorized whomever is making the current decisions to do so? Why is the family asking fans what they would like to see released if they have no say in what gets released?

She also said to not hold our breath in regards to remasters but didn't elaborate. These seem like the easiest and most obvious choices for posthumous releases, but she implied otherwise. So what's the problem?

The Heirs are the people entitled to the property of the deceased.

The estate is Prince's business entities that have to maintain until they are dissolved. The judge put Comerica in charge of handling the estate including opening Paisley Park as a museum, and releasing the 4Ever and PR Deluxe records.

The Family will have no say in what is released.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #214 posted 08/20/17 3:14pm

Silvertongue7

That was a fantastic read, but it made me think that the less involvement the heirs have in what and how is released, the better for the fans...

Someone's in my body, someone's in my body...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #215 posted 08/20/17 5:03pm

SchlomoThaHomo

avatar

muleFunk said:

SchlomoThaHomo said:

She made a point to draw a line between the heirs and the estate, divulging that they had no say in regards to estate matters. I found this confusing. I thought the heirs WERE the estate. And who is the estate if not the heirs, why do the heirs have no say, who is/are making the current estate decisions, and who authorized whomever is making the current decisions to do so? Why is the family asking fans what they would like to see released if they have no say in what gets released?

She also said to not hold our breath in regards to remasters but didn't elaborate. These seem like the easiest and most obvious choices for posthumous releases, but she implied otherwise. So what's the problem?

The Heirs are the people entitled to the property of the deceased.

The estate is Prince's business entities that have to maintain until they are dissolved. The judge put Comerica in charge of handling the estate including opening Paisley Park as a museum, and releasing the 4Ever and PR Deluxe records.

The Family will have no say in what is released.


Thanks for explaining. However, it still makes no sense for them to be asking fans what we want to be released when they have no say in the matter.

"That's when stars collide. When there's space for what u want, and ur heart is open wide."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #216 posted 08/21/17 1:27am

laurarichardso
n

SchlomoThaHomo said:



muleFunk said:




SchlomoThaHomo said:


She made a point to draw a line between the heirs and the estate, divulging that they had no say in regards to estate matters. I found this confusing. I thought the heirs WERE the estate. And who is the estate if not the heirs, why do the heirs have no say, who is/are making the current estate decisions, and who authorized whomever is making the current decisions to do so? Why is the family asking fans what they would like to see released if they have no say in what gets released?

She also said to not hold our breath in regards to remasters but didn't elaborate. These seem like the easiest and most obvious choices for posthumous releases, but she implied otherwise. So what's the problem?




The Heirs are the people entitled to the property of the deceased.


The estate is Prince's business entities that have to maintain until they are dissolved. The judge put Comerica in charge of handling the estate including opening Paisley Park as a museum, and releasing the 4Ever and PR Deluxe records.



The Family will have no say in what is released.




Thanks for explaining. However, it still makes no sense for them to be asking fans what we want to be released when they have no say in the matter.


They will inherit one day and they will have a say. That day is coming.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #217 posted 08/21/17 3:52am

MMJas

avatar

databank said:

I couldn't care less who P's greatest love was but I'd just like to kindly point out that...

- I doubt any such thing is even quantifiable. I certainly would have a hard time saying who was my greatest love, because each relationship was different, intense on different levels and for different reasons, involving very different women in very different circumstances, not to mention that I wasn't the same person at 20, 25, 30, 35 or 40, and that being in love and being in a relationship didn't mean the same then than later on than now.

- The notion of "one's greatest love" is relatively childish IMHO, very romantic and cute, but a little odd to keep entertaining after a certain age. I mean there are people who can tell for sure who was their greatest love (usually those people have been in only a few relationships), but it's up to them to tell, not others. Which brings me to...

- When I listen to even my closest friends speak about my past relationships, I often realize how hard it is for others to grasp the reality of what went on in my mind/heart, or what was really at stake in each different relationship.

We have here a man who had quite an extraordinary amount of crushes and relationships in his life, some pretty intense if we're to believe the songs only, not to mention 2 marriages. His sister was asked, and gave her opinion, that's cool. At least she knew him. But she just offered an opinion.

And the next thing we know we have dozens of people who haven't even met the man once in their life debating about matters they actually don't have a clue about.

I mean, seriously.

If there's any such thing as "Prince's love of his life", which I seriously doubt, I don't think it's up to anyone to tell but him, let alone people who have never met him at all.

Just my 2 cents.

Totally agree. It's her opinion. Plus, it's the only one that is no longer living, so it should get her off the hook in regards to "picking sides". That way she avoids choosing from any living ones. ; )

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #218 posted 08/21/17 4:55am

laurarichardso
n

MMJas said:

databank said:

I couldn't care less who P's greatest love was but I'd just like to kindly point out that...

- I doubt any such thing is even quantifiable. I certainly would have a hard time saying who was my greatest love, because each relationship was different, intense on different levels and for different reasons, involving very different women in very different circumstances, not to mention that I wasn't the same person at 20, 25, 30, 35 or 40, and that being in love and being in a relationship didn't mean the same then than later on than now.

- The notion of "one's greatest love" is relatively childish IMHO, very romantic and cute, but a little odd to keep entertaining after a certain age. I mean there are people who can tell for sure who was their greatest love (usually those people have been in only a few relationships), but it's up to them to tell, not others. Which brings me to...

- When I listen to even my closest friends speak about my past relationships, I often realize how hard it is for others to grasp the reality of what went on in my mind/heart, or what was really at stake in each different relationship.

We have here a man who had quite an extraordinary amount of crushes and relationships in his life, some pretty intense if we're to believe the songs only, not to mention 2 marriages. His sister was asked, and gave her opinion, that's cool. At least she knew him. But she just offered an opinion.

And the next thing we know we have dozens of people who haven't even met the man once in their life debating about matters they actually don't have a clue about.

I mean, seriously.

If there's any such thing as "Prince's love of his life", which I seriously doubt, I don't think it's up to anyone to tell but him, let alone people who have never met him at all.

Just my 2 cents.

Totally agree. It's her opinion. Plus, it's the only one that is no longer living, so it should get her off the hook in regards to "picking sides". That way she avoids choosing from any living ones. ; )

We have muliptle people who have stated this a few times now. Also because she was the love of his life it does not mean he did not get over her and move on.

Everybody has the one person that gives them those Thunderstruck moment. He obvisouly had over women and other friendships but he may never have anything like that Thuderstruck moment he had with Vanity. I believe Mayte talks about this in her book.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #219 posted 08/21/17 7:20am

rogifan

avatar

muleFunk said:



SchlomoThaHomo said:


She made a point to draw a line between the heirs and the estate, divulging that they had no say in regards to estate matters. I found this confusing. I thought the heirs WERE the estate. And who is the estate if not the heirs, why do the heirs have no say, who is/are making the current estate decisions, and who authorized whomever is making the current decisions to do so? Why is the family asking fans what they would like to see released if they have no say in what gets released?

She also said to not hold our breath in regards to remasters but didn't elaborate. These seem like the easiest and most obvious choices for posthumous releases, but she implied otherwise. So what's the problem?




The Heirs are the people entitled to the property of the deceased.


The estate is Prince's business entities that have to maintain until they are dissolved. The judge put Comerica in charge of handling the estate including opening Paisley Park as a museum, and releasing the 4Ever and PR Deluxe records.



The Family will have no say in what is released.


How do we know they will have no say in the matter? The guy from Spotify can choose to involve the siblings if he wants. Also with Paisley Park being managed by Graceland there seems to be a distinction/separation between that and the music side of things. So far the family seems to be more involved with Paisley Park.
Paisley Park is in your heart
#PrinceForever 💜
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #220 posted 08/21/17 11:16pm

Mumio

avatar

rogifan said:

muleFunk said:

The Heirs are the people entitled to the property of the deceased.

The estate is Prince's business entities that have to maintain until they are dissolved. The judge put Comerica in charge of handling the estate including opening Paisley Park as a museum, and releasing the 4Ever and PR Deluxe records.

The Family will have no say in what is released.

How do we know they will have no say in the matter? The guy from Spotify can choose to involve the siblings if he wants. Also with Paisley Park being managed by Graceland there seems to be a distinction/separation between that and the music side of things. So far the family seems to be more involved with Paisley Park.


Pretty sure everything is detailed in the court papers if that is what you are looking for.

Welcome to "the org", Mumio… they can have you, but I'll have your love in the end.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #221 posted 08/23/17 2:16pm

Cyn

avatar

when was the last time she spoke with Prince?? for years probably. so sad... No interest. Prince would have hate that
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #222 posted 08/24/17 12:29pm

LonelyStarfish

Cyn said:

when was the last time she spoke with Prince??
for years probably. so sad... No interest.
Prince would have hate that


I'd go as far as saying decades tbh.
Music is music, ultimately. If it makes you feel good, cool.

My YouTube channel
https://www.youtube.com/c...pp=desktop
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #223 posted 08/26/17 3:19am

June7

Moderator

avatar

moderator

babynoz said:



luvgirl said:


Are some of you guys kidding me? Prince sister divulged in a question and answer thread, that in her opinion she thought Denise Matthews was the love of Prince's life! No one is suppose to talk about it? Everyone should please shut up and go away? This is to be swept under the rug? Nothing to see here...? Lol. As this is a Prince fan site, and everyone has been talking about everything under the sun pertaining to Prince including his love life since the dawn of 2002, why stop now at Sharon's comment about Denise being the love of his life? Lol. There is absolutely nothing wrong with having a debate about this.

No one will ever know for absolute certain without a doubt who the love of Prince's life was, but since people have been speculating for years that it was Vanity/Denise and since Prince's sister just stated her opinion that she thinks its Denise as well, it's kind of hard not to entertain it as a thought. I mean, if you asked me who the love of my sister's life was, I guarantee you I would get it right... and vice versa... But okay I get it, it's her opinion. But what an opinion it was! Yea, I think I'm gonna talk about this for a while. For as long as I want. Her comment is worth contemplating. You might not find this interesting, but just because you don't, doesn't mean you need to try to stop people from talking about it. Do you guys see some of the threads that are on this site? They speculate about his son! They speculate about his death! They speculate about how he did drugs, when he did drugs, how much drugs it was that he did, but no one is suppose to talk about his love life? Or is it just this one particular comment we're not supposed to talk about...? [Edited 8/18/17 18:55pm]



I agree with you....it's bullshit. nod


Thank you for pointing out the glaring hypocrisy and double standards. I am guessing that if Sharon had named Mayte as the love of his life, this pissing and moaning and whining would not be happening.

I do not recall the mods picking and choosing which of Sharon's words we are permitted to discuss and I agree that much more private stuff has and is being discussed here that no one seems to have a problem with.




[There are no rules in discussing the interview or content of the interview, except to remain respectful and civil. In Sharon's opinion, it was Denise. Someone else may have a different opinion. Discussion is healthy, as are other points of view. And, in all honesty, Prince took that info with him. But, HER OPINION was that it was Denise. - June7]
[PRINCE 4EVER!]

[June7, "ModGod"]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #224 posted 08/26/17 3:30am

June7

Moderator

avatar

moderator

rogifan said:

Dangelus said:



Rebeljuice said:


The most revealing things from part II for me are:

1) how little input the heirs seem to have regarding business decisions this late in the game.

2) How WB and the heirs seem to have very little common interest and do not seem to be on the same page.

3) How she may be as in the dark about the circumstances surrounding his death as the rest of us.

4) The heirs (or at least Sharon's) ideas going forward regarding the music is reasuring.

5) I found it a little worrying that she says they want to maintain Prince's ideals regarding swearing etc. She even seemed to imply disapointment in WB for releasing We Can Fuck. I hope this doesn't mean a whole bunch of songs will remain unreleased because the lyrics are less than clean.



Regarding 5) she sort of contradicted herself a little by saying that one the one hand they would totally respect P's wishes when it came to the type of material he would want released but later stated that he issue was with PERFORMING the material and that the recordings are part of the historical record.



To be fair if they were going to toally respect his wishes in terms of what should be released then nothing would be released as that was his wish at the time and he left no instructions to the contrary as far as we know...


Obviously Prince still allowed all of his albums to be purchased as is. I remember when BET interviewed him during Musicology and asked him about performing songs like Head and Erotic City he replied “you got the records”. But music that hasn’t been released yet is a completely different matter IMO. I have a really hard time believing Prince would’ve signed off on any unreleased music that contained profanity. With the PR remaster he only submitted the remastered album, everything else was WB’s decision.


The fact is, he really didn't care in the end.
He left zero instructions. He gave zero f&@ks.
[PRINCE 4EVER!]

[June7, "ModGod"]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #225 posted 08/26/17 6:06am

purplefam99

June7 said:

rogifan said:


Obviously Prince still allowed all of his albums to be purchased as is. I remember when BET interviewed him during Musicology and asked him about performing songs like Head and Erotic City he replied “you got the records”. But music that hasn’t been released yet is a completely different matter IMO. I have a really hard time believing Prince would’ve signed off on any unreleased music that contained profanity. With the PR remaster he only submitted the remastered album, everything else was WB’s decision.


The fact is, he really didn't care in the end.
He left zero instructions. He gave zero f&@ks.



I think of him as he throws his guitar up when I think of him and a will.
He seemed at peace never worried.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #226 posted 08/26/17 6:39pm

rogifan

avatar

June7 said:

rogifan said:


Obviously Prince still allowed all of his albums to be purchased as is. I remember when BET interviewed him during Musicology and asked him about performing songs like Head and Erotic City he replied “you got the records”. But music that hasn’t been released yet is a completely different matter IMO. I have a really hard time believing Prince would’ve signed off on any unreleased music that contained profanity. With the PR remaster he only submitted the remastered album, everything else was WB’s decision.


The fact is, he really didn't care in the end.
He left zero instructions. He gave zero f&@ks.

Why would he need to leave instructions? I think everyone knew how he felt about profanity. And if he had left instructions saying don’t release anything with profanity fans would be cool with it? I doubt it.
Paisley Park is in your heart
#PrinceForever 💜
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #227 posted 08/26/17 7:06pm

purplefam99

rogifan said:

June7 said:



The fact is, he really didn't care in the end.
He left zero instructions. He gave zero f&@ks.

Why would he need to leave instructions? I think everyone knew how he felt about profanity. And if he had left instructions saying don’t release anything with profanity fans would be cool with it? I doubt it.



I agree. Sadly I don't think the desire to respect his wishes will win over the desire for more Prince music.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #228 posted 08/27/17 9:52am

poppys

Release it all and let people judge for themselves. It reflects a life lived, not cataloged. As great an artist as he was and WE are going to now censor his words, his music, his poetry? Yeah, that one Leonardo DaVinci drawing wasn't so good...

Kick the old-school joints. For the true funk soldiers.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #229 posted 08/27/17 1:20pm

PennyPurple

avatar

poppys said:

Release it all and let people judge for themselves. It reflects a life lived, not cataloged. As great an artist as he was and WE are going to now censor his words, his music, his poetry? Yeah, that one Leonardo DaVinci drawing wasn't so good...

yeahthat

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #230 posted 08/27/17 11:48pm

kremlinshadow

avatar

June7 said:

babynoz said:



I agree with you....it's bullshit. nod


Thank you for pointing out the glaring hypocrisy and double standards. I am guessing that if Sharon had named Mayte as the love of his life, this pissing and moaning and whining would not be happening.

I do not recall the mods picking and choosing which of Sharon's words we are permitted to discuss and I agree that much more private stuff has and is being discussed here that no one seems to have a problem with.


[There are no rules in discussing the interview or content of the interview, except to remain respectful and civil. In Sharon's opinion, it was Denise. Someone else may have a different opinion. Discussion is healthy, as are other points of view. And, in all honesty, Prince took that info with him. But, HER OPINION was that it was Denise. - June7]

Well that's utter BS, you deleted my comment about the interview being not very revealing and that Sharon probably didn't know him all too well. Taking things a little to personal and to the extreme when editing people's views.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #231 posted 08/28/17 9:25am

williamb610

Where is part 3 of the Q&A with Sharon? I'm tired of waiting!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #232 posted 08/28/17 9:35am

purplefam99

williamb610 said:

Where is part 3 of the Q&A with Sharon? I'm tired of waiting!




I was wondering too.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #233 posted 08/28/17 11:07am

nelcp777

purplefam99 said:

williamb610 said:

Where is part 3 of the Q&A with Sharon? I'm tired of waiting!

I was wondering too.

Looking forward to Part 3. It would be nice if the Org could do something similar with Prince's other brothers and sisters.

It would be nice to see how each view was different from their perspective viewpoint.

It would also be cool if the Org could pull off a Q&A with bandmembers, assistants, tech, etc.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #234 posted 08/31/17 12:50am

June7

Moderator

avatar

moderator

rogifan said:

June7 said:



The fact is, he really didn't care in the end.
He left zero instructions. He gave zero f&@ks.

Why would he need to leave instructions? I think everyone knew how he felt about profanity. And if he had left instructions saying don’t release anything with profanity fans would be cool with it? I doubt it.

But, he didn't. So what's your point?
If he never wanted it heard or released he would've destroyed it.
Y'all are ridiculous thinking it should never see the light of day.
Go put your heads in the sand and listen to The Rainbow Children until you grow up. hmm
[PRINCE 4EVER!]

[June7, "ModGod"]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #235 posted 08/31/17 12:54am

June7

Moderator

avatar

moderator

[Part III coming soon ... stay tuned ... but chill out ...]
[PRINCE 4EVER!]

[June7, "ModGod"]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #236 posted 08/31/17 1:34am

Mumio

avatar

June7 said:

But, he didn't. So what's your point? If he never wanted it heard or released he would've destroyed it. Y'all are ridiculous thinking it should never see the light of day. Go put your heads in the sand and listen to The Rainbow Children until you grow up. hmm



lol

Welcome to "the org", Mumio… they can have you, but I'll have your love in the end.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #237 posted 08/31/17 2:33am

TheEnglishGent

avatar

June7 said:

rogifan said:
Why would he need to leave instructions? I think everyone knew how he felt about profanity. And if he had left instructions saying don’t release anything with profanity fans would be cool with it? I doubt it.
But, he didn't. So what's your point? If he never wanted it heard or released he would've destroyed it. Y'all are ridiculous thinking it should never see the light of day. Go put your heads in the sand and listen to The Rainbow Children until you grow up. hmm


At this point we still don't know what is or isn't in the vault. For all we know he did destroy the songs wihth profanity in them.

RIP sad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #238 posted 08/31/17 10:24am

james

avatar

I only read the first part, but it really sounds like they need a steer from fans about what they should be looking out for when searching the vault and deciding priorities for releases!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #239 posted 09/10/17 9:37pm

206Michelle

rogifan said:

Dangelus said:

Regarding 5) she sort of contradicted herself a little by saying that one the one hand they would totally respect P's wishes when it came to the type of material he would want released but later stated that he issue was with PERFORMING the material and that the recordings are part of the historical record.

To be fair if they were going to toally respect his wishes in terms of what should be released then nothing would be released as that was his wish at the time and he left no instructions to the contrary as far as we know...

Obviously Prince still allowed all of his albums to be purchased as is. I remember when BET interviewed him during Musicology and asked him about performing songs like Head and Erotic City he replied “you got the records”. But music that hasn’t been released yet is a completely different matter IMO. I have a really hard time believing Prince would’ve signed off on any unreleased music that contained profanity. With the PR remaster he only submitted the remastered album, everything else was WB’s decision.

This is an interesting discussion. I wonder if Prince left instructions regarding his music as the property of an LLC or trust. I am not a lawyer, but my understanding is that the holdings of an LLC or trust may be more private than the holdings of an estate.

.

I have a hypothesis (educated guess) about what Prince wanted to happen to his unreleasec music, particularly music that would be more controversial, such as heavy on sexual content and cursing. We Can F**k from PR Deluxe is a perfect example. My hypothesis is that he wanted to abdicate the responsibility for releasing the more controversial music to others for the sake of his own salvation.

.

Prince had some very contradictory beliefs and behaviors. I believe that he also dealt with some inner struggles regarding his love of sex, musical creativity, and love of God, because these were not always compatible. He spent 9 years of his life married. So I will exclude from this discussion sex during marriage because this is acceptable and expected as a part of Christian belief. Christian denominations have various levels of strictness regarding sex outside of marriage. However, as far as I know, every Christian denomination preaches as a matter of dogma that sex should take place within marriage, not outside of marriage.

.

There are numerous songs in which Prince expresses his inner conflict about sex or tries to reconcile his love of sex (while he wasn't married) and religious beliefs. In my opinion, "Temptation" is the song that best expresses the tension he felt between his love of sex (while unmarried) and his love of God. Anna Stesia is another one, and he sides with God in this song. Prince was always very concerned about his salvation. However, he continued to push the sexual boundaries of music in spite of his Christian beliefs. Then he changed in the mid-1990s because of the saddest moment of his adult life, his son’s death.

.

Mayte writes in her book that prince came to believe that Amiir's death was part of the price that he had to pay for his behaviour as a younger man. Amiir's death caused him to go through soul searching, according to Mayte's book. An end result of this soul-searching was that Prince ended up becoming a Jehovah's Witness in 2001, as we all know. His music is very different pre-2001 than from 2001 and onward. There is considerably less sexual content in the music from 2001 and onward and swearing is absent from the music from 2001 and onward. The content of his music changed because he cared about his salvation and the consequences of his behaviour.

.

I think that if Prince really objected to the release of We Can F**k, he would have requested the master as a part of his deal with WB in 2014 in order to prevent WB from releasing WCF. WCF is a masterpiece of epic proportions, but is to date, the most sexually explicit track of music by Prince that is released. Darling Nikki caused enough of a firestorm in the mid-80s due to its sexual content; I could only imagine how controversial WCF would have been. If Prince had released disc 2 of Purple Rain Deluxe while he was living, the powers that be of the JW faith may have raised their eyebrows at Wonderful Ass, and he could have received excommunication from the JW faith if he released WCF. He very likely would have lost the privilege to knock on people’s doors and proselytize if he released WCF while alive. But, if he really didn’t want us to hear it, he would have made arrangements to prevent its release. He wanted us to hear songs like WCF, but he didn’t want to have any role in releasing such tracks. He wanted someone else to be responsible for releasing these controversial tracks. I think that by allowing WB to release it, maybe he felt that it wouldn't impact his salvation because he wasn't directly responsible for its release. Again, this is my hypothesis.

.

If he left written instructions, even handwritten notes, about what to do with the contents of the vault, respect those wishes. Otherwise, release everything that is finished.

Live 4 Love ~ Love is God, God is love, Girls and boys love God above
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 8 of 9 <123456789>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Discuss The Sharon Nelson Q&A Thread Here - And Only Here